| Peer-Reviewed

Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico

Received: 25 October 2021    Accepted: 13 November 2021    Published: 19 November 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The cultivation of tamarind in the producing regions of Mexico and in backyard trees is affected by insects that feed on the fruit, causing losses in yield and quality; Among the insects is the tamarind fruit and seed borer. The objective of this work was to specifically determine and evaluate the damage caused by the fruit borer. Samples were carried out in 10 tamarind trees, five trees in a backyard and five trees in a plantation established in the Álvaro Obregon community of the municipality of Villaflores, Chiapas. The collections were made directly and through the fruits with signs of the presence of the borer. For the evaluation of the damage, the total fruits of 10 trees were collected where the total number of fruits and the number of fruits infested by the borer were quantified and in this way the percentage of damaged fruits was calculated. The tamarind fruit borer was determined as the Caryedon gonagra (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) species, originally from the old world Africa, of the monophyletic group, because which is reported for the states of Colima and Morelos, this report is considered the first record for the State of Chiapas. Adults are 4 to 6 mm in length, and are characterized by presenting the prothorax in a subrectangular shape, the body slightly elongated, with golden pubescence with black or light brown spots, sometimes with small dark brown spots scattered throughout the body. differing especially in the elytra and hind legs. In the field, the initial infestation of the tamarind fruit borer in the state of Chiapas occurs at the beginning of November when the female oviposits the eggs in the middle of the tree on the tamarind pods, regardless of size. and fruit development. The damage begins when the larva penetrates the pod reaching the seed of the fruit, until reaching the adult stage, affecting 7,108 fruits, which is equivalent to 26,400 g, which represents 35.76% of the total production per tree. Regarding the weight of the tamarind fruit by C. gonagra, there is a reduction in weight of 9.341 g tree-1, that is, it affects 11.24% the production of tamarind per tree.

Published in American Journal of Entomology (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI 10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13
Page(s) 116-123
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Insect, Tamarin, Hurt, Evaluation

References
[1] Orozco-Santos, M., García K., Hernández F., L. M., Velázquez M., J. J., Bermúdez G., M. D. J., Robles G. M. M. y Nieto A., D. 2014. Biología y manejo integrado del barrenador del fruto (Caryedon serratus Oliver) en el cultivo de tamarindo [Biology and integrated management of the fruit borer (Caryedon serratus Oliver) in the tamarind crop]. SAGARPA-INIFAP. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/d6ae/94e543854a70527d4336222f6fe5c53f8e09.pdf.
[2] Parrotta, A., J. 2000. Leguminosae Familia de las leguminosas Caesalpinioideae Subfamilia de las casias [Leguminosae Legume family Caesalpinioideae Cassia subfamily]. 519-523 Pp. Servicio Forestal del USDA https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237287082_Leguminosae_Familia_de_las_leguminosas_Caesalpinioideae_Subfamilia_de_las_casias.
[3] Azad, S. 2018. Tamarind - Tamarindus indica. En S. Rodríguez (Eds), Exotic Fruit (Primera ed., pp 403-412), Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803138-4.00055-1.
[4] Orozco-Santos, M. 2001. El cultivo de tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L) en el trópico seco de México [The cultivation of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L) in the dry tropics of Mexico]. SAGARPA-INIFAP. 1. 2 - 51. http://cesix.inifap.gob.mx/frutalestropicales/articulos/57.pdf
[5] Montes, F., G., Garcia, S. M. D., Gómez, O. J. L., y Serrano, H. 2006. ¿Conocemos al tamarindo? Tamarindus indica L., una planta de usos múltiples. Su propagación y micropropagación [Do we know tamarind? Tamarindus indica L., a multipurpose plant. Its propagation and micropropagation]. ContactoS, 62, 66-70.
[6] Vázquez-Yanes, C., Batis M. A. I., Alcocer S. M. I., Gual D. M. y Sánchez D. C. 1999. Árboles y arbustos potencialmente valiosos para la restauración ecológica y la reforestación [Trees and shrubs potentially valuable for ecological restoration and reforestation]. Proyecto J-084 – CONABIO – UNAM. http://www.conabio.gob.mx/conocimiento/info_especies/arboles/doctos/22-legum52.pdf.
[7] Morton, J. F. 1987. Tamarind, (p. 115-121). In: fruits of warm climmates. Miami, Florida, United States of North America. Creative Resources Systems, Inc. https://hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/morton/tamarind.html#Description
[8] El-Siddig, K., Gunasena, H. P. M., Prasad, B. A., Pushpakumara, D. K. N. G., Ramana, K. V. R., Vijayanand, P., y Williams, J. T. 2006. Tamarind Tamarindus indica L. En: J. T Williams (Ed), Fruits for the Future 1. 1a. ed. Pp. 12-135. Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops. https://books.google.com.mx/books?id=QhtZLMVPLIIC&lpg=PR1&hl=es&pg=PR1#v=onepage&q&f=false.
[9] Dezhao, C., Te-chao, C., Dianxiang, Z., y Larsen, K. 2010. Tamarindus Linnaeus, Flora of China, 10, 22-26.
[10] Tucker, S. C. 2000. Floral development in tribe Detarieae (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Amherstia, Brownea, and Tamarindus. American Journal of Botany, 87 (10), 1385-1407. https://bsapubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2307/2656867
[11] López L., J. 2018. Litchi (Litchi chinensis) y Tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L.) dos frutales con potencial en México [Litchi (Litchi chinensis) and Tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L.) two fruit trees with potential in Mexico]. [Monografía]. http://repositorio.uaaan.mx:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/4969/T16584%20%20LOPEZ%20LOPEZ%20JORGE%20%20MONOG..pdf?sequence=1.
[12] Chaturvedi, A. N. 1985. Firewood farming on degraded lands in the Gangetic plain. U. P. Forest Bulletin 50. Lucknow, India: Uttar Pradesh Forest Department. 52 p.
[13] Kumar, S. P. 2004. Monograph on Tentul (Tamarindus indica L.) [Mongografia]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309490791_Monograph_on_Tentul_Tamarindus_indica_L.
[14] Statista Research Departament. 2020. Production of tamarind in India FY 2018, by leading state. https://www.statista.com/statistics/870980/tamarind-production-by-state-india/.
[15] Directorate General of Commercial Intelligence and Statistics (DGCIS). 2020. India export of agro food products. http://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in/indexp/Product_description.aspx?hscode=08134010&ctrycode=.
[16] Viveros, G. J. C., Figueroa, R. K. A., Gallardo, L. F., García, P. E., Ruiz, R. O., y Hernández, R., F. 2012. Sistemas de manejo y comercialización de tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L.) en tres municipios de Veracruz [Management and marketing systems for tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) in three municipalities of Veracruz]. Revista mexicana de ciencias agrícolas, 3 (6), 1217 - 1230. http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-09342012000600012&lng=es&tlng=es.
[17] Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera (SIAP). 2019. Anuario Estadístico de la Producción Agrícola [Statistical Yearbook of Agricultural Production]. https://nube.siap.gob.mx/cierreagricola/
[18] Joshi, R. C., y David, B. V. 2018. Nematode, mite and insect pests of tamarind: a review. Agriculture for Development, 35, 52-63. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vasantharaj-David-2/publication/329962072_Nemataode_mite_and_insect_pests_of_tamarind_A_reviewAg4Dev35_2018_Tamarind_pests_Review/links/5c2593a0458515
a4c7fcccb3/Nemataode-mite-and-insect-pests-of-tamarind-A-reviewAg4Dev35-2018-Tamarind-pests-Review.pdf.
[19] Aguilar C., F., Morales M., C. J., Aguilar A. E. y Cruz G. J. E. 2020. Insectos asociados al cultivo de Tamarindo (Tamarindus indica) en Villaflores, Chiapas [Insects associated with the cultivation of Tamarindo (Tamarindus indica) in Villaflores, Chiapas]. Congreso Mesoamericano. https://www.desarrollo.idt.unach.mx/congresoMesoamericano/revista/2020/mobile/index.html#p=1082.
[20] Rajagopal, D. y Krishnamoorthy, A. 1996. Bionomics and management of oriental yellow scale, Aonidiella orientalis (Newstead) (Homoptera: Diaspididae): an over view. Agricultural Reviews (Karnal), 17 (3-4), 139-146. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19980702589
[21] Singh, P., y Ahmad, M. (1989). A Handy Guide on Insect Pests of Tamarind and their Control. The Indian Forester, 115 (9), 673 – 679. http://www.indianforester.co.in/index.php/indianforester/article/view/9107
[22] Nair, K. S. 2007. Tropical forest insect pests: ecology, impact, and management. Cambridge University Press. 424 p. https://books.google.es/books?id=QvOPufXCJq0C&lpg=PA10&ots=L3FgkVvFT8&dq=Tropical%20%20Forest%20%20Insect%20Pests%3A%20%20Ecology%20%20Impact%20and%20%20
Managemen&lr&hl=es&pg=PA10#v=onepage&q=Tropical%20%20Forest%20%20Insect%20Pests:%20%20Ecology%20%20Impact%20and%20%20
Managemen&f=false.
[23] Joseph, K. V., and Oommen, C. N., 1960. Notes on some insect pests infesting dry tamarind fruits in Kerala. Indian Journal of Entomology, 22 (3), 172-180.
[24] Singh, H. S., Mandal, S., and Hegde, M. R. 2014. Insect pests of tropical and sub-tropical underutilized fruits. In: National Seminar on Strategies for Conservation, Improvement and Utilization of Underutilized Fruits. Central Horticultural Experiment Station (CHES) ICAR-IIHR, Chettalli, Madikeri, Kodagu, Kamataba. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Sudhamoy-Mandal/publication/278032226_Insect_pests_of_tropical_and_sub-tropical_underutilized_fruits/links/557ab19c08aef90db60cdb03/Insect-pests-of-tropical-and-sub-tropical-underutilized-fruits.pdf.
[25] Cotton, R. T. 1920. Tamarind Pod Borer, Sitophilus linearis (Hbst.). Journal of agricultural research, 20 (6), 439-446. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19210500495.
[26] Arthur, V., y Arthur, P. B. 2006. Controle de" Sitophilus linearis"(Herbst)(Coleóptera: curculionidae) em" Tamarindus indica" através da radiaçao gama do Cobalto-60 [Control of" Sitophilus linearis"(Herbst)(Coleoptera: curculionidae) in"Tamarindus indica" through Cobalt-60 gamma radiation]. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal. Plagas, 32 (1), 121-124.
[27] Egbon, I. N., y Ayertey, J. N. 2009. Identification of a Sitophilus species (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) infesting cowpea seeds in Ghana: a short communication. Savannah Journal of Agriculture, 4, 1-4. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ikponmwosa-Egbon/publication/233386714_Identification_of_a_Sitophilus_Species_Coleoptera_Curculionidae_InfestingCowpea_Seeds_in_Ghana_A_SHORT
_COMMUNICATION/links/5590e99908ae15962d8c685f/Identification-of-a-Sitophilus-Species-Coleoptera-Curculionidae-InfestingCowpea-Seeds-in-Ghana-A-SHORT-COMMUNICATION.pdf.
[28] Mercado-Mesa, M., Álvarez-Osorio V. M., Quiroz J. A. y Muriel S. B. 2018. Insectos fitófagos en el cultivo de tamarindo con énfasis en los que causan daño al fruto en el Occidente cercano Antioqueño [Phytophagous insects in tamarind cultivation with emphasis on those that cause damage to the fruit in the nearby West of Antioquia]. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía, Medellin, 71 (3): 8553-8562.
[29] Romero N., J., y Johnson, C. D. 2002. Cassia moschata HBK, new host for Caryedon serratus (Olivier) in the New World (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae). Coleopterists Bulletin, 56 (1), 95-96. https://doi.org/10.1649/0010-065X(2002)056[0095:SN]2.0.CO;2
[30] Yus-Ramos, R. Y. 1976. Las especies de Brúquidos (gorgojos de las leguminosas) de interés agrícola y fitosanitario (Col. Bruchidae) II: Sistemática y biología [The Bruquidae species (legume weevils) of agricultural and phytosanitary interest (Col. Bruchidae) II: Systematics and biology]. Boletín de Sanidad Vegetal. Plagas, 2 (2), 161 - 203. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rafael-Yus/publication/28162455_Las_especies_de_Bruquidos_gorgojos_de_las_leguminosas_de_interes_agricola_y_fitosanitario_Col_Bruchidae_II
_Sistematica_y_biologia/links/543f97a10cf27832ae8b8f52/Las-especies-de-Bruquidos-gorgojos-de-las-leguminosas-de-interes-agricola-y-fitosanitario-Col-Bruchidae-II-Sistematica-y-biologia.pdf
[31] Yus-Ramos, R., Kingsolver, J. M., y Romero-Nápoles, J. 2007. Sobre el estatus taxonómico actual de los brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en los Chrysomeoloidea [On the current taxonomic status of the bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in the Chrysomeoloidea]. Dugesiana, 14 (1), 1 - 22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255601816_Sobre_el_estatus_taxonomico_actual_de_los_bruquidos_Coleoptera_Bruchidae
_en_los_Chrysomeloidea.
[32] Kingsolver, J. M. 2004a. Handbook of the Bruchidae of the United States and Canada (Insecta, Coleoptera). United States Departament of Agriculture (USDA). 2 (1912). 1-198. https://www.ars.usda.gov/is/np/Bruchidae/BruchidaeVol2.pdf
[33] Ramírez S., A. 2013. Estudio faunístico de Brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en el estado de México, México [Faunal study of Brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in the state of Mexico, Mexico]. Tesis de doctorado en Ciencia. Colegio de Postgraduados. Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. https://1library.co/document/6zke504z-estudio-faunistico-bruquidos-coleoptera-bruchidae-mexico-mexico.html.
[34] Yus-Ramos, R. 2012. Una propuesta de cocientes biométricos y otros datos morfológicos para la descripción de especies de brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) [A proposal for biometric ratios and other morphological data for the description of bruchid species (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)]. Boletín de la Asociación Española de Entomología, 36 (1-2), 227-232.
[35] De la Cruz P., A. 2009. Estudio faunístico de brúquidos (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) en el estado de Tabasco, México [Faunal study of bruchids (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in the state of Tabasco, Mexico]. Tesis de doctorado en Ciencia. Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. http://www.cm.colpos.mx/inicio/images/tesis_p/desarrollo_rural/tesis_estudio.pd.
[36] Romero-Nápoles, J. 2002. Bruchidae. J. Llorente Bousquets y Juan J. Morrone (Ed.). Biodiversidad, taxonomía y biogeografía de artrópodos de México: Hacia una síntesis de su conocimiento [Biodiversity, taxonomy and biogeography of arthropods of Mexico: Towards a synthesis of their knowledge]. Vol. III. 513-534 p. http://coleopteraneotropical.org/BIBLIOTECAJEBT/pdf/bruchidae/Romero%20N.J.,%202002.pdf.
[37] Yus-Ramos, R. 2008. Descripción del aparato genital femenino de catorce especies de brúquidos de la fauna canaria (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) [Description of the female genital tract of fourteen species of bruchids of the Canary fauna (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)]. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 32 (1-2), 39 - 54. http://coleoptera-neotropical.org/BIBLIOTECAJEBT/pdf/bruchidae/Yus,%20R.R.%202008b.pdf.
[38] De Luca, Y. 1956. Contributions à l’étude morphologique et biologique de Bruchus lentis Fröhl. Essais de lute [Contributions to the l’étude morphologique et biologique by Bruchus lentis Fröhl. fight essais]. Ann. Inst. Agric. Algérie, 10 (1), 1-94. http://dspace.ensa.dz:8080/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/635/ia00p097b.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
[39] Siemens, D. H., Johnson C. D. y Woodman R., L. 1991. Determinants of host range in Bruchid Beetles. Ecology, 73 (5), 1560-1566. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264992689_Seed_weight_and_oviposition_site_selection_in_the_genus_Caryedon_Coleoptera_Bruchidae.
[40] Romero N., J. 2016. BRUCOL, a database for Bruchidae worldwide (Insecta: Coleoptera), Conference: Entomological Society of America Annual Meeting. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267522755_BRUCOL_a_database_for_Bruchidae_worldwide_Insecta_Coleopterajnapole.
[41] Borror, D. J., Triplehorn, D. J. C. A., y Johnson, N. F. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects, 7a. ed. Edit. Thompson Brooks: Belmont, California, USA. 820 p.
[42] Romero N., J. y Johnson C. D. 2004a. BRUCOL, una base de datos para Bruchidae (Insecta: Coleoptera) [BRUCOL, a database for Bruchidae (Insecta: Coleoptera)]. Programa de Entomología, Instituto de Fitosanidad, Colegio de Postgraduados, Montecillo, Texcoco, Estado de México. Vol. 1, 524 p.
[43] Delobel, A., Sembène, M., Fédière, G., y Roguet, D. 2003. Identity of the groundnut and tamarind seed-beetles (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae), with the restoration of Caryedon gonagra (F.). In Annales de la Sociétè entomologique de France, 39 (3), 197-206.
[44] Romero-Nápoles, J. y Segura-León, O. L. 2015. Estatus Taxonómico de Caryedon serratus (Olivier) en México [Taxonomic Status of Caryedon serratus (Olivier) in Mexico]. Southwestern Entomologist, 40 (2), 387-396. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280988783_Estatus_Taxonomico_de_Caryedon_serratus_Olivier_en_Mexico.
[45] Crowson, R. A. 1960. The phylogeny of Coleoptera. Annual Review of Entomomology, 5: 111-154.
[46] Kingsolver J. M. 1995. On the family Bruchidae. Chrysomela No. 30. 2 P.
[47] Lawrence, J. M. and A. F. Newton. 1982. Evolution and Classification of Beetles. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 13: 261 - 290.
[48] Borowiec L. 1987. The genera of seed-beetles (Coleoptera, Bruchidae). Polskie Pismo Entomologiczne, 57. 207 P.
[49] Reid C. 1996. More on the family Bruchidae. Chrysomela, 31: 3.
[50] Davey, P. M. 1958. The groundnut bruchid, Caryedon gonagra (F). Bulletin of Entomological Research, 49: 385-404.
[51] Vélez-Ángel, R. 1972. Tres plagas insectiles recientemente detectadas en Antioquía [Three insect pests recently detected in Antioquia]. El gorgojo del tamarindo, Caryedon serratus Olivier. Revista Facultad Nacional de Agronomía Medellín, 2: 71-74.
[52] Nilsson, J. A., and C. D. Johnson. 1993. A taxonomic revision of the palm bruchids (Pachymerini) and a description of the world genera the Pachymerinae. Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, 41, 1-104.
[53] Sánchez S., A. 1994. Manual práctico de las principales plagas de productos almacenados [Practical manual of the main pests of stored products]. AG-DGSV. Costa Rica. 114 p. https://catalogo.fedepalma.org/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=17003
[54] Silvain, J. F., and Delobel, A. 1998. Phylogeny of West Africa Caryedon (Coleoptera: Bruchidae): Congruence between molecular and morphological data. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 9: 533-541.
[55] Cunningham C., D. C., K. B. Walsh. 2002. Establishment of the peanut bruchid (Caryedon serratus) in Australia and two new host species, Cassia brewsteri and C. tomentella. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 42: 57-63.
[56] Romero N., J. y Johnson C. D. 2004b. Sinopsis de los brúquidos de México (Insecta: Coleoptera) [Synopsis of the brúquidos de México (Insecta: Coleoptera)]. In: Entomología Mexicana. A. Morales Moreno, M. Ibarra González, A. del P. Rivera González y S. Stanford Camargo (Eds). Vol. 3: 758-763.
[57] Ranga-Rao, M., Rameshwar-Rao V. and Nigam S. N. 2010. Post-harvest insect pests of groundnut and their management. Information Bulletin No. 84. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics. Andhra Pradesh, India. 20 p.
[58] Orozco-Santos, M., K. García-Mariscal, M. Robles-González, J. J. Velázquez-Monreal, M. A. Manzanilla-Ramírez, L. M. Hernández Fuentes, G. Manzo-Sánchez, y D. Nieto-Ángel 2012. El Barrenador de la Semilla Caryedon serratus Oliver (Coleóptera: Bruchidae) en Tamarindo en el trópico seco de México [The Seed Borer Caryedon serratus Oliver (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) in Tamarindo in the dry tropics of Mexico]. Southwestern Entomologist, 37 (3): 403-410
[59] Yus, R. R. 2010. Los Caryedontini de la Península Arábiga (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) [The Caryedontini of the Arabian Peninsula (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)]. Boletin de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, 47: 341-347.
[60] Kingsolver, J. M. 1970 Insects not known to occllr in the Continental United States. Groundnut bruchid Caryedon serratus (Olivier). United States Departament of Agriculture (USDA). Coop. Econ. Ins. Rpt. 20 (18): 303.
[61] López-Vera, E. E., Martínez-Mirafuentes, A., López-Martínez, V., Campos-Figueroa, M., y Domínguez-Monge, S. 2019. New record of Caryedon serratus causing damage to tamarindo fruits in Morelos, México. Southwestern Entomologist, 44 (3), 785-788.
[62] Oaya, C. S., A. M. Malgwi, and A. E. Samaila. 2012. Damage potential and loss caused by the groundnut bruchid Caryedon serratus Olivier (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) on stored groundnut and tamarind in Yola. Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science, 1: 58-62.
[63] Landaverte-Toruño, R. A. 2003. Las plagas de los productos alimenticios almacenados de la región [Pests of stored food products in the region]. Organismo Internacional Regional de Sanidad Agropecuaria (OIRSA). El Salvador. 171 p.
[64] Gutiérrez B., J. M. 2009. Determinación de la biología del barrenador Caryedon serratus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae) del fruto de tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L.) [Determination of the biology of the borer Caryedon serratus (Oliver) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae: Pachymerinae) of the tamarind fruit (Tamarindus indica L.)]. (No. TESIS 2255.). UACh. Departamento Parasitología Agrícola.
[65] Orozco-Santos, M., J. M. Gutiérrez-Bautista, J. L. Vázquez- Jiménez, y R. Ortega-Arreola. 2008. Biología y manejo integrado de plagas del tamarindo [Biology and integrated pest management of tamarind]. In: Orozco-Santos, M., J. L. Vázquez-Jiménez, M. M. Robles-González, y A. Vizcaíno- Guardado (Eds). El cultivo del tamarindo (Tamarindus indica L.). Libro Técnico Num. 1. Campo Experimental Tecomán, CIRPAC, INIFAP. Tecomán, Colima, México. 298 p.
[66] Godínez-Álvarez H, A. Flores-Martínez. 2000. Germinación de semillas de 32 especies de plantas de la costa de Guerrero. Su utilidad para la restauración ecológica [Seed germination of 32 plant species from the Guerrero coast. Its usefulness for ecological restoration]. Polibotánica, 11: 1-19.
[67] Janzen, D. H. 1971. Seed Predation by Animals. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 2: 465-492.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Fabiola Aguilar Castillo, Carlos Joaquin Morales Morales, Jesus Romero Napoles, Eduardo Aguilar Astudillo, Jorge Alejandro Espinosa Moreno. (2021). Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico. American Journal of Entomology, 5(4), 116-123. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Fabiola Aguilar Castillo; Carlos Joaquin Morales Morales; Jesus Romero Napoles; Eduardo Aguilar Astudillo; Jorge Alejandro Espinosa Moreno. Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico. Am. J. Entomol. 2021, 5(4), 116-123. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Fabiola Aguilar Castillo, Carlos Joaquin Morales Morales, Jesus Romero Napoles, Eduardo Aguilar Astudillo, Jorge Alejandro Espinosa Moreno. Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico. Am J Entomol. 2021;5(4):116-123. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13,
      author = {Fabiola Aguilar Castillo and Carlos Joaquin Morales Morales and Jesus Romero Napoles and Eduardo Aguilar Astudillo and Jorge Alejandro Espinosa Moreno},
      title = {Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico},
      journal = {American Journal of Entomology},
      volume = {5},
      number = {4},
      pages = {116-123},
      doi = {10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.aje.20210504.13},
      abstract = {The cultivation of tamarind in the producing regions of Mexico and in backyard trees is affected by insects that feed on the fruit, causing losses in yield and quality; Among the insects is the tamarind fruit and seed borer. The objective of this work was to specifically determine and evaluate the damage caused by the fruit borer. Samples were carried out in 10 tamarind trees, five trees in a backyard and five trees in a plantation established in the Álvaro Obregon community of the municipality of Villaflores, Chiapas. The collections were made directly and through the fruits with signs of the presence of the borer. For the evaluation of the damage, the total fruits of 10 trees were collected where the total number of fruits and the number of fruits infested by the borer were quantified and in this way the percentage of damaged fruits was calculated. The tamarind fruit borer was determined as the Caryedon gonagra (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) species, originally from the old world Africa, of the monophyletic group, because which is reported for the states of Colima and Morelos, this report is considered the first record for the State of Chiapas. Adults are 4 to 6 mm in length, and are characterized by presenting the prothorax in a subrectangular shape, the body slightly elongated, with golden pubescence with black or light brown spots, sometimes with small dark brown spots scattered throughout the body. differing especially in the elytra and hind legs. In the field, the initial infestation of the tamarind fruit borer in the state of Chiapas occurs at the beginning of November when the female oviposits the eggs in the middle of the tree on the tamarind pods, regardless of size. and fruit development. The damage begins when the larva penetrates the pod reaching the seed of the fruit, until reaching the adult stage, affecting 7,108 fruits, which is equivalent to 26,400 g, which represents 35.76% of the total production per tree. Regarding the weight of the tamarind fruit by C. gonagra, there is a reduction in weight of 9.341 g tree-1, that is, it affects 11.24% the production of tamarind per tree.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Specific Determination and Evaluation of the Damage of the Tamarind Fruit Borer (Tamarindus indica L.) in Villaflores, Chiapas, Mexico
    AU  - Fabiola Aguilar Castillo
    AU  - Carlos Joaquin Morales Morales
    AU  - Jesus Romero Napoles
    AU  - Eduardo Aguilar Astudillo
    AU  - Jorge Alejandro Espinosa Moreno
    Y1  - 2021/11/19
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13
    T2  - American Journal of Entomology
    JF  - American Journal of Entomology
    JO  - American Journal of Entomology
    SP  - 116
    EP  - 123
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-0537
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.aje.20210504.13
    AB  - The cultivation of tamarind in the producing regions of Mexico and in backyard trees is affected by insects that feed on the fruit, causing losses in yield and quality; Among the insects is the tamarind fruit and seed borer. The objective of this work was to specifically determine and evaluate the damage caused by the fruit borer. Samples were carried out in 10 tamarind trees, five trees in a backyard and five trees in a plantation established in the Álvaro Obregon community of the municipality of Villaflores, Chiapas. The collections were made directly and through the fruits with signs of the presence of the borer. For the evaluation of the damage, the total fruits of 10 trees were collected where the total number of fruits and the number of fruits infested by the borer were quantified and in this way the percentage of damaged fruits was calculated. The tamarind fruit borer was determined as the Caryedon gonagra (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) species, originally from the old world Africa, of the monophyletic group, because which is reported for the states of Colima and Morelos, this report is considered the first record for the State of Chiapas. Adults are 4 to 6 mm in length, and are characterized by presenting the prothorax in a subrectangular shape, the body slightly elongated, with golden pubescence with black or light brown spots, sometimes with small dark brown spots scattered throughout the body. differing especially in the elytra and hind legs. In the field, the initial infestation of the tamarind fruit borer in the state of Chiapas occurs at the beginning of November when the female oviposits the eggs in the middle of the tree on the tamarind pods, regardless of size. and fruit development. The damage begins when the larva penetrates the pod reaching the seed of the fruit, until reaching the adult stage, affecting 7,108 fruits, which is equivalent to 26,400 g, which represents 35.76% of the total production per tree. Regarding the weight of the tamarind fruit by C. gonagra, there is a reduction in weight of 9.341 g tree-1, that is, it affects 11.24% the production of tamarind per tree.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 4
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Villaflores, Mexico

  • Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Villaflores, Mexico

  • Phytosanity, Postgraduate College, Montecillo Campus, Texcoco, Mexico

  • Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Villaflores, Mexico

  • Faculty of Agronomic Sciences, Autonomous University of Chiapas, Villaflores, Mexico

  • Sections