Food and feed is the most aspect in agricultural sector. Potential land is covered by crop production to feed the increasing human population. Hence, for livestock production feed production is challenging to be solved at farm level. Therefore, balancing the available land for crop and livestock production is critical as the land is fixed resource. This could be achieved by demonstrating year round forage production on small area. This activity was conducted at highland districts of Guji zone to evaluate biomass yield of Desho grasses and to enhance the knowledge and skills of farmers on production of Desho grass. Areka DZF № #590 and Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 desho grasses were planted on 5m×10m with the recommended packages. Knowledge and skills of farmers were taken before and after demonstration. Training and mini field day was organized. Cutting and carry system was used to feed livestock. Measurement, observation and interview were used to collect the data. Plot cover, plant height regeneration and fresh biomass were collected. 17 Knowledge and skills questions were prepared and interviewed to 18 farmers before and after demonstration. Descriptive and t tests were used to analysis the data. The result of descriptive showed that Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety had more plot cover (88.47%) than Areka DZF № #590 variety (85.76%). As desho grass is annual forage and regeneration trait was important for livestock feed. Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety also provide high in regeneration capacity (85%) than Areka DZF № #590 (83%). More fresh biomass was obtained from Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 (49.78t/ha) than Areka DZF № #590 (47.59t/ha). The result of paired sample test showed that there was a mean significance difference in knowledge and skills before and after on demonstration of desho grasses at 0.001 level. Knowledge and skills of farmers were increased by trainings and field days organized on desho grass demonstration. Both desho grasses were identified and preferred for livestock feed by experimental farmers. Desho grasses were important as feed, soil erosion control and as income generating. Therefore, it is better to pre scaled up these desho grasses at highland areas of Guji zone. To know more advantage of desho grass as livestock feed further research is needed on the effect of desho grass on milk and meat production at the study areas.
Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 11, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14 |
Page(s) | 23-28 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Desho Grass, Demonstration, Guji, Areka, Kindo Kosha
[1] | Ministry of Agriculture (MOA), 2021. A livestock information system roadmap for Ethiopia. In: Ethiopian Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock Improvement Corporation (LIC) (NZ), the Alliance of Bioversity International and CIAT, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/aLIVERoadmapdocumentFinal.pdf. |
[2] | Hidosa, D., Getaneh, D., 2021. Evaluation of desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) grass varieties for dry matter yield and chemical composition under irrigation in two districts of South Omo zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. East Afr. J. Sci. 15 (1), 71–78. |
[3] | Jirata, M., Grey, S., Kilawe, E., 2016. Ethiopia Climate-Smart Agriculture Scoping Study. FAO, Rome. |
[4] | Wondimagegnhu BA, Huluka AT, Nischalke SM (2019). Determinants of farm livelihoods of smallholder farmers in Yayu biosphere reserve, SW Ethiopia: a gender disaggregated analysis. Cogent Economics & Finance. 7 (1): 1645583. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2019.1645583 |
[5] | Duguma B, Dermauw V, Janssens G (2017). The assessment and the farmers’ perceived ranking of feed resources and coping strategies with feed scarcity in smallholder dairy farming in selected district towns of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Tropical animal health and production. 49 (5): 923-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-017-1274-z |
[6] | Denbela H, Berako B, Sintayehu K. Evaluation of Desho (Pennisetum pedicellatum) Grass Varieties for Dry Matter Yield and Chemical Composition in South Omo Zone, South Western Ethiopia. Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J. 2020; 25 (2): 556294. DOI: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2020.25.556294. |
[7] | Abera M, Tolera A, Nurfeta A and Geleti D (2021). Production, utilization and constraints of Desho grass (Pennisetum glaucifolium) as livestock feed in Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 11 (6): 196-205. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.51227/ojafr.2021.29. |
[8] | Basha Kebede, Dembi Korji, Girma Amare. Pre Extension Demonstration of Adapted Oat Varieties at Midland Areas of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia International Journal of Animal Science and Technology. Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021, pp. 42-46. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20210502.13. |
[9] | Basha Kebede, Peter N. Ewang and Eric Ndemo 2017 The Analysis of Profitability of Smallholder Potato Growers in Bore District, Guji Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. Journal of Resources Development and Management. www.iiste.org |
[10] | Basha Kebede and Dembi Korji (2017) Pre-scaling up of improved faba bean technologies in the highland districts of Guji Zone, Oromia regional state, Ethiopia. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 7 (6), 115-119 DOI: 10.18488/journal.1005/2017.7.6/1005.6.115.119. |
[11] | Teshale Jabessa, Ketema Bekele, Zinash Amare. Evaluation of Desho Grass for Their Agronomic Performances and Nutritive Values in Highland and Midland Areas of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Science Research. Vol. 9, No. 3, 2021, pp. 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.sr.20210903.11. |
[12] | Tarekegn A, D Amsalu, K Adane and E Gashaw, 2020. Pre-scaling up of desho grass production and utilization technologies for sheep fattening in central gondar zone, Ethiopia. Int J Agri Biosci, 9 (4): 184-188. |
[13] | Tessema Tesfaye Atum 2022. Repeated cuttings under farmer management effect on growth and yield performance of Pennisetum glaucifolium varieties in major agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. Heliyon 8 (2022) e09344. |
[14] | Kebede Basha, Bayisa Mekonen, Korji Dembi, Amare Girma, Delbo Abraham. Demonstration of Bee Technologies at Ana Sora District, Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Animal and Veterinary Sciences. Vol. 10, No. 3, 2022, pp. 46-54. doi: 10.11648/j.avs.20221003.11. |
[15] | Danano D (2007). Improved grazing land management- Ethiopia. In H. Liniger, & W. Critchley (Eds,), Where the land is greener. Bern, Switzerland: WOCAT. Pp 313-316. |
[16] | Umer S, Aticho A, Kiss E (2019). Effects of integrated use of grass strip and soil bund on soil properties, Southern Ethiopia. Journal of Degraded and Mining Lands Management. 6 (2): 1569. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15243/jdmlm.2019.062.1569. |
[17] | Yakob G, Ababa A (2015). Participatory evaluation of different multipurpose grass species for graded soil bund stabilization in Gimbo district, South West Ethiopia. Open Access Library Journal. 2 (06): 1. Google Scholar. |
APA Style
Basha Kebede, Tekle Bobo, Dembi Korji, Girma Amare. (2023). Pre Extension Demonstration of Improved Desho Grasses at Highland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 11(1), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14
ACS Style
Basha Kebede; Tekle Bobo; Dembi Korji; Girma Amare. Pre Extension Demonstration of Improved Desho Grasses at Highland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2023, 11(1), 23-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14
AMA Style
Basha Kebede, Tekle Bobo, Dembi Korji, Girma Amare. Pre Extension Demonstration of Improved Desho Grasses at Highland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2023;11(1):23-28. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14
@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14, author = {Basha Kebede and Tekle Bobo and Dembi Korji and Girma Amare}, title = {Pre Extension Demonstration of Improved Desho Grasses at Highland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry}, volume = {11}, number = {1}, pages = {23-28}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20231101.14}, abstract = {Food and feed is the most aspect in agricultural sector. Potential land is covered by crop production to feed the increasing human population. Hence, for livestock production feed production is challenging to be solved at farm level. Therefore, balancing the available land for crop and livestock production is critical as the land is fixed resource. This could be achieved by demonstrating year round forage production on small area. This activity was conducted at highland districts of Guji zone to evaluate biomass yield of Desho grasses and to enhance the knowledge and skills of farmers on production of Desho grass. Areka DZF № #590 and Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 desho grasses were planted on 5m×10m with the recommended packages. Knowledge and skills of farmers were taken before and after demonstration. Training and mini field day was organized. Cutting and carry system was used to feed livestock. Measurement, observation and interview were used to collect the data. Plot cover, plant height regeneration and fresh biomass were collected. 17 Knowledge and skills questions were prepared and interviewed to 18 farmers before and after demonstration. Descriptive and t tests were used to analysis the data. The result of descriptive showed that Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety had more plot cover (88.47%) than Areka DZF № #590 variety (85.76%). As desho grass is annual forage and regeneration trait was important for livestock feed. Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety also provide high in regeneration capacity (85%) than Areka DZF № #590 (83%). More fresh biomass was obtained from Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 (49.78t/ha) than Areka DZF № #590 (47.59t/ha). The result of paired sample test showed that there was a mean significance difference in knowledge and skills before and after on demonstration of desho grasses at 0.001 level. Knowledge and skills of farmers were increased by trainings and field days organized on desho grass demonstration. Both desho grasses were identified and preferred for livestock feed by experimental farmers. Desho grasses were important as feed, soil erosion control and as income generating. Therefore, it is better to pre scaled up these desho grasses at highland areas of Guji zone. To know more advantage of desho grass as livestock feed further research is needed on the effect of desho grass on milk and meat production at the study areas.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Pre Extension Demonstration of Improved Desho Grasses at Highland Districts of Guji Zone, Southern Oromia, Ethiopia AU - Basha Kebede AU - Tekle Bobo AU - Dembi Korji AU - Girma Amare Y1 - 2023/03/16 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 23 EP - 28 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20231101.14 AB - Food and feed is the most aspect in agricultural sector. Potential land is covered by crop production to feed the increasing human population. Hence, for livestock production feed production is challenging to be solved at farm level. Therefore, balancing the available land for crop and livestock production is critical as the land is fixed resource. This could be achieved by demonstrating year round forage production on small area. This activity was conducted at highland districts of Guji zone to evaluate biomass yield of Desho grasses and to enhance the knowledge and skills of farmers on production of Desho grass. Areka DZF № #590 and Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 desho grasses were planted on 5m×10m with the recommended packages. Knowledge and skills of farmers were taken before and after demonstration. Training and mini field day was organized. Cutting and carry system was used to feed livestock. Measurement, observation and interview were used to collect the data. Plot cover, plant height regeneration and fresh biomass were collected. 17 Knowledge and skills questions were prepared and interviewed to 18 farmers before and after demonstration. Descriptive and t tests were used to analysis the data. The result of descriptive showed that Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety had more plot cover (88.47%) than Areka DZF № #590 variety (85.76%). As desho grass is annual forage and regeneration trait was important for livestock feed. Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 variety also provide high in regeneration capacity (85%) than Areka DZF № #590 (83%). More fresh biomass was obtained from Kindo Kosha DZF № #591 (49.78t/ha) than Areka DZF № #590 (47.59t/ha). The result of paired sample test showed that there was a mean significance difference in knowledge and skills before and after on demonstration of desho grasses at 0.001 level. Knowledge and skills of farmers were increased by trainings and field days organized on desho grass demonstration. Both desho grasses were identified and preferred for livestock feed by experimental farmers. Desho grasses were important as feed, soil erosion control and as income generating. Therefore, it is better to pre scaled up these desho grasses at highland areas of Guji zone. To know more advantage of desho grass as livestock feed further research is needed on the effect of desho grass on milk and meat production at the study areas. VL - 11 IS - 1 ER -