Parkland agroforestry practices have placed greater emphasis on improving the climate, improving fertility, protecting water, and improving biodiversity. The objective of this paper is therefore to review the management and its ecological contribution to the diversity of wood species in agroforestry in Ethiopia in parklands. The practice is known by growing isolated trees on arable land by incorporating annual plants; that preserves biodiversity. Parkland agroforestry, a system practiced by many local populations, encompasses most of the agricultural landscape in Ethiopia and is very important in several aspects such as: for food security, microclimate improvement, economic benefits, environmental protection, household energy, household appliances, cultural values, traditional medicine and animal feed. There are many indigenous multipurpose tree species scattered across farmland in Ethiopia, and some of the most popular include: Millettia ferruginea, Cordia africana, Ficus vasta, Ficus sur, Croton macrostachyus, and Faidherbia albida. Parkland tree management is a process for controlling arboriculture competition in agricultural fields, so the selection and management of the species involved affects the success of the system. Management of the trees is essential to ensure the continued return of mulch or leaf forage and light shade through the use of heading, pruning and pruning measures, which should be done in early summer.
| Published in | American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 5) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13 |
| Page(s) | 292-298 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Management, Diversity, Parkland, Environmental Contribution
| [1] | Abebe, T. (2005). Diversity in Homegraden Agroforestry Systems of Southern Ethiopia (143 p.). PhD Dissertation, Wageningen: Wageningen Agricultural University. |
| [2] | Abera MW (2017). Woody Species Diversity of Parkland Agroforestry in Ethiopia. Global J. Technol. Optim.; 8 (2): 01-04. doi: 10.4172/2229- 8711.1000218. |
| [3] | Acharya, K. P. (2006). Linking trees on farms with biodiversity Conservation in subsistence farming systems in Nepal. Biodiversity Conservation 15: 631–646. |
| [4] | Ard, G. L. (2003). ‘Diversity makes a difference’Farmers managing inter- and intra-specific tree species diversity in Meru Kenya, p. 37. |
| [5] | Arnold, J. E. M., & Dewees, P. A. (1995). Tree Management in Farmer Strategies: Responses to Agricultural Intensification. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| [6] | Arnold, M. (1997). Farming the Issues. In M. Arnold, & P. A. Dewees (Eds.), Farms, Trees, and Farmers. Responses to Agricultural Intensification (pp. 3-11). London: Earthscan Publications Ltd. |
| [7] | Atta K., Kindt R., Skilton, J., and Amaral, W., (2004). Managing biological and genetic diversity in tropical agroforestry. Agroforestry Systems, 61: 183-194. |
| [8] | Bannister, M. E., & Nair, P. K. R (2003). Agroforestry Adoption in Haiti: The Importance of Household and Farm Characteristics. Agroforestry Systems. P. 57, 149-157. |
| [9] | Bayala, J., Teklehaimanot, Z. and S. J. Ouedraogo,(2002), Millet production under pruned tree crowns in a parkland system in Burkina Faso School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor, Gwynedd, LLL57 2UW, Uk. |
| [10] | Bayala, J., Sanou, J., Teklehaimanot, Z., Kalinganire, A., & Ouédraogo, S. J. (2014). Parklands for Buffering Climate Risk and Sustaining Agricultural Production in the Sahel of West Africa. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 28-34. |
| [11] | Bekele-Tesemma, A. (Ed.) (2007). Profitable Agroforestry Innovations for Eastern Africa: Experience from 10 Agroclimatic Zones of Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Tanzania, and Uganda. World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), Eastern Africa Region. |
| [12] | Bhagwat SA, Willis KJ, Birks HJB, Whittaker RJ (2008). Agroforestry a refuge Int. Legal Mechanism for Management, Geothermal Development Company Nairobi Kenya, Presented at Short Course IV on Exploration for Geothermal Resources, organized by UNU-GTP, KenGen and GDC at Lake Naivasha, Kenya; pp. 1-22. |
| [13] | Boffa, J. M (2000). West African Agroforestry Parklands: Keys to Conservation and Sustainable Management. Unasylva. – p. 51, 11-17. |
| [14] | Boffa, J. M. (1999). Agroforestry Parklands in Sub-Saharan Africa. FAO Conservation Guide, Rome. |
| [15] | Boffa, J. M., Turyomurugyendo, L., Barnekow-Lilles, J. P., & Kindt, R. (2005). Enhancing Farm Tree Diversity as a Means of Conserving Landscape Based Biodiversity. Mountain Research and Development, 25, 212-217. https://doi.org/10.1659/0276-4741(2005)025[0212:EFTDAA]2.0.CO;2 |
| [16] | Bongers, G (2010). Dynamics in People-Tree Interactions in Farm Fields; Farmers’ Perspectives in Meskan District, Ethiopia. |
| [17] | Boshier, D. H.; Gordon, J. E.; Barrance, A. J (2006). Prospects for Agro-Ecosystems: Meso american Dry-Forest. Biodiversity Docs/Training/FGR_TG/additional_materials. |
| [18] | Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) (2005). Workshop (p. 26). Nairobi: ICRAF Headquarters. |
| [19] | CTA (2003). Agroforestry. Arbruset Agricultures MultietageesD’ Afrique. CTA, Wageningan, the Netherlands P. 280. |
| [20] | De Jong, W. (2001). Tree and Forest Management in the Floodplains of the Peruvian Amazon. Forest Ecology and Management, 150, 125-134. |
| [21] | Endale, Y., Abayneh, D., Mekuria, A., & Catherine, M. (2017). Farmland Tree Species Diversity and Spatial Distribution Pattern in Semi-Arid East Shewa, Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 26, 199-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2016.1266971. |
| [22] | Estifanos SB (2018). Parkland Agroforestry of Ethiopia; Key to Production, Productivity, Biodiversity Conservation and Climate Change Mitigation: A Review. Open J. Forestry.; 8 (4): 472-88. |
| [23] | FAO (Food and Agriculture organization of United Nations).(2008). Deforestation continues at an alarming rte. FAO, retrieved 18 February, 2008 from http://www.fao.org/news room/en/news/2005/1000127/index, Html. |
| [24] | Fifanou, V. G., Ousmane, C., Gauthier, B. and Brice, S. (2011) Traditional agroforestry systems and biodiversity conservation in Benin (West Africa) Agroforestry Systems, Volume 82, Issue 1, May 2011, Pages 1-13. |
| [25] | Gizachew, Z., Tesfaye, A., & Wassie, H. (2015). Ficus vasta L. in Parkland and Agroforestry Practices of Hawassa Zuria District, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Natural Resources, 15, 1-14. |
| [26] | Guyassa, E., & Raj, A. J. (2013). Assessment of Biodiversity in Cropland Agroforestry and Its Role in Livelihood Development in Dryland Areas: A Case Study from Tigray Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Technology, 9, 829-844. |
| [27] | ICRAF (2000). Paths to Prosperity through Agroforestry. ICRAF’s Corporate Strategy, 2001-2010. Nairobi: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry. |
| [28] | Jonsson, K., Ong, C. K. And Odongo, J. C. W. (1998). Influence of scattered trees nere and karite trees on microclimate, soil fertility and millet yield in Burkinafaso Expl Agric. (1999), volume 35. |
| [29] | Jose S (2012). Agroforestry for conserving and enhancing biodiversity. Agrofor. Syst.; 85: 01–08. |
| [30] | Kindeya, G (2004). Dryland Agroforestry Strategy for Ethiopia. In The Drylands Agroforestry Workshop (p. 26). Nairobi: ICRAF Headquarters. |
| [31] | Leakey RRB (1996). Definition of agroforestry revisited. Agroforestry today 8: 5-7. |
| [32] | Lemage B, Legesse A (2018). Management and socioeconomic determinants of woody species diversity in parkland Agroforestry in Tembaro District, Southern Ethiopia. Biodivers. Int. J.; 2 (5): 456‒62. |
| [33] | Long, A. J., & Nair, P. K. R. (1999). Trees outside Forests: Agro-, Community, and Urban Forestry. New Forests, 17, 145-174. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006523425548. |
| [34] | Mcneely, A., and schroth G., (2006). Agroforestry and biodiversity conservation traditional practices, present dynamics and lessons for the future. Biodiversity and conservation 15: 549- 554. |
| [35] | Meza, F. J., Hansen, J. W. and Osgood, D., (2008). Economic value of seasonal climate forecasts for agriculture: review of ex-ante assessments and recommendations for future research. Journal of applied meteorology and climatology, 47 (5), pp. 1269-1286. |
| [36] | Miller, A. W., & Pallardy, S. G. (2001). Resource Competition across the Crop Tree Interface in a Maize-Silver Maple Temperate Alley Cropping Stand in Missouri. Agroforestry Systems, 53, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013327510748 |
| [37] | Muleta D. Assefa F (2011). Nemomissa S. Socioeconomic benefits of shade trees in coffee production systems in Bonga and Yayu Hurumu districts, southwestern Ethiopia. |
| [38] | Munroe, J. W. and Isaac, M. E. (2014). N 2-fixing trees and the transfer of fixed-N for sustainable agroforestry: a review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 34 (2), pp. 417-427. |
| [39] | Nair PKR, Garrity D (2012). Agroforestry the future of global land use. Adv. Agroforestry; 9: 531. |
| [40] | Nair PKR, Gordon AM, Mosquera-Losada MR (2008), Agroforestry In: Jorgensen SE, Fath BD. (Eds.), Ecol. Eng., Encyclopedia Ecol. Vol. 1. Elsevier, Oxford, U.K; pp. 101-10. |
| [41] | Nair, P. K. R. (1993). An Introduction to Agroforestry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-1608-4 |
| [42] | Negash, M. (2007). Trees Management and Livelihoods in Gedeo’s Agroforests, Ethiopia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods 17157-168. |
| [43] | Peter Poschen, (1986). An evaluation of the Acacia albida-based agroforestry practices in the Hararghe highlands of Eastern Ethiopia Agroforestry systems, Volume 4, Number 2, 129-143. |
| [44] | Raj, J. A., & Lal, B. S. (2014). Agroforestry Theory and Practices. Jodhpur: Scientific Publishers. |
| [45] | Rani D, Batish, Kohli RK, Jose S, Singh HP (2008). Eco. Basis of Agroforestry. |
| [46] | Roothaert, R. & Franzel, S (2001). Farmers’ Preferences and Use of Local Fodder Trees and Shrubs in Kenya. |
| [47] | Scales BR, Marsden SJ (2008). Biodiversity in small-scale tropical Agroforestry. A review of species richness and abundance shifts and the factors influencing them. Environ. Conserve. 35 (2): 160–72. |
| [48] | Schuren, S. H. G., & Snelder, D. J (2008). Tree Growing on Farms in Northeast Luzon. |
| [49] | Thorlakson T (2011). Reducing Subsistence Farmers’ Vulnerability to Climate Change: The Potential Contributions of Agroforestry in Western Kenya. Occasional; 16-62. |
| [50] | Tolera, M. (2006). Woody Species Diversity of Agricultural Landscapes in Arsi Negelle District, Ethiopia: Implications for Biodiversity Conservation. M.Sc. Thesis, Hawassa: Wondo Genet College of Forestry, Hawassa University. |
| [51] | Van Noordwijk, M., Lusiana, B. and Ni'matul Khasanah, R. M. (2000). WaNuLCAS 2.0. Background on a model of water, nutrient and light capture in agroforestry systems. International Centre for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF), Bogor, Indonesia. |
| [52] | Wetangula GN. (2009) Biodiversity, Conservation and Loss. |
| [53] | Zewde A. and Nebiyou M (2019). Parkland Agroforestry Practices on Biodiversity Conservation- A Review. |
| [54] | Zhang, H., John, R., Peng, Z., Yuan, J., Chu, C. et al. (2012). The Relationship between Species Richness and Evenness in Plant Communities along a Successional Gradient: A Study from Sub-Alpine Meadows of the Eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. PLoS ONE, 7, e49024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0049024 |
| [55] | Zubair, M. & Garforth, C (2006). Farm-Level Tree Planting in Pakistan: The Role of Farmers Perceptions and Attitudes. Agroforestry Systems. –p. 66, 217-229. |
APA Style
Kasu Hailu Biru. (2021). Management and Environmental Contribution of Woody Species Diversity Parkland Agroforestry System in Ethiopia. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(5), 292-298. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13
ACS Style
Kasu Hailu Biru. Management and Environmental Contribution of Woody Species Diversity Parkland Agroforestry System in Ethiopia. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(5), 292-298. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13
AMA Style
Kasu Hailu Biru. Management and Environmental Contribution of Woody Species Diversity Parkland Agroforestry System in Ethiopia. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(5):292-298. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13,
author = {Kasu Hailu Biru},
title = {Management and Environmental Contribution of Woody Species Diversity Parkland Agroforestry System in Ethiopia},
journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
volume = {9},
number = {5},
pages = {292-298},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210905.13},
abstract = {Parkland agroforestry practices have placed greater emphasis on improving the climate, improving fertility, protecting water, and improving biodiversity. The objective of this paper is therefore to review the management and its ecological contribution to the diversity of wood species in agroforestry in Ethiopia in parklands. The practice is known by growing isolated trees on arable land by incorporating annual plants; that preserves biodiversity. Parkland agroforestry, a system practiced by many local populations, encompasses most of the agricultural landscape in Ethiopia and is very important in several aspects such as: for food security, microclimate improvement, economic benefits, environmental protection, household energy, household appliances, cultural values, traditional medicine and animal feed. There are many indigenous multipurpose tree species scattered across farmland in Ethiopia, and some of the most popular include: Millettia ferruginea, Cordia africana, Ficus vasta, Ficus sur, Croton macrostachyus, and Faidherbia albida. Parkland tree management is a process for controlling arboriculture competition in agricultural fields, so the selection and management of the species involved affects the success of the system. Management of the trees is essential to ensure the continued return of mulch or leaf forage and light shade through the use of heading, pruning and pruning measures, which should be done in early summer.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Management and Environmental Contribution of Woody Species Diversity Parkland Agroforestry System in Ethiopia AU - Kasu Hailu Biru Y1 - 2021/09/26 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13 T2 - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JF - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry JO - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry SP - 292 EP - 298 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-8591 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210905.13 AB - Parkland agroforestry practices have placed greater emphasis on improving the climate, improving fertility, protecting water, and improving biodiversity. The objective of this paper is therefore to review the management and its ecological contribution to the diversity of wood species in agroforestry in Ethiopia in parklands. The practice is known by growing isolated trees on arable land by incorporating annual plants; that preserves biodiversity. Parkland agroforestry, a system practiced by many local populations, encompasses most of the agricultural landscape in Ethiopia and is very important in several aspects such as: for food security, microclimate improvement, economic benefits, environmental protection, household energy, household appliances, cultural values, traditional medicine and animal feed. There are many indigenous multipurpose tree species scattered across farmland in Ethiopia, and some of the most popular include: Millettia ferruginea, Cordia africana, Ficus vasta, Ficus sur, Croton macrostachyus, and Faidherbia albida. Parkland tree management is a process for controlling arboriculture competition in agricultural fields, so the selection and management of the species involved affects the success of the system. Management of the trees is essential to ensure the continued return of mulch or leaf forage and light shade through the use of heading, pruning and pruning measures, which should be done in early summer. VL - 9 IS - 5 ER -
Information
Email: