Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine

Oleksandr Demydov; Svitlana Khomenko; Maryna Fedorenko; Yevhenii Kuzmenko; Serhii Pykalo

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

| Peer-Reviewed

Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine

Oleksandr Demydov, Svitlana Khomenko, Maryna Fedorenko, Yevhenii Kuzmenko, Serhii Pykalo

Published in American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 2)

Received: 25 February 2021 Accepted: 11 March 2021 Published: 22 March 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

When working with collection material, one of the main problems is the study of most of the samples in a cycle of three years and the annual partial renewal of the set under study. Therefore, only a part of the varieties can be directly compared with each other in terms of ecological stability, and the main grouping has to be carried out by comparing the behavior of samples with standard varieties under conditions of different years. Even well-studied varieties are not always suitable for such comparisons. When selecting the starting material for breeding, it is important not only to find forms with a high level of manifestation of quantitative traits, but also to minimize this level under unfavorable conditions for plant growth and development. The purpose of our research was to determine the stability and plasticity of collection samples of spring durum wheat of various ecological and geographical origins. Over the years of the research, the yield averaged 330.3 g/m² and varied from 434.3 g/m²(max) in 2015 to 188.5 g/m² (min) in 2018. This indicates that the genotype and contrast weather conditions of the years significantly affect the yield of collection samples of spring durum wheat. Stable and plastic collection samples of spring durum wheat were identified for yield: 193 THKNEE 8 (Mexico) (b_i = 1.02, S²d_i = 0.11), ARN AAZ-1.040 YRC-4M (Mexico) (b_i = 1.35, S²d_i = 0.12), SHAG 21 / CASCA (Mexico) (b_i = 1.07, S²d_i = 0.23), Hordeiforme 13-07 (Ukraine) (b_i = 2.11, S²d_i = 0.31). According to the results of our research, it was found that the highest grain weight per spike (1.90 g) was in the sample Voronezhskaya 11 (Russia), and the lowest value was in the sample Damsinskaya yantarnaya (Kazakhstan) (1.57 g). Among the plastic and stable collection samples by the grain weight per spike, the following samples were distinguished: DUN / MUSK 1 (b_i = 3.45; S²d_i = 0.07), SHAG 9 / BBUTO / 7 (b_i = 1.61; S²d_i = 0, 05), CASM 3 // SRN 3 ASAIH 15 (b_i = 1.47; S²d_i = 0.00), GREEN / SOMO (b_i = 1.35; S²d_i = 0.01) (Mexico), Lilek (Russia) (b_i = 0.92, S²d_i = 0.03), MAGH 72 FUTO ALG 86 (Mexico) (b_i= 0.75, S²d_i = 0.01), YAZI 13 (Mexico) (b_i = 0.12, S²d_i = 0.07).

Published in	American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
Page(s)	83-88
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Spring Durum Wheat, Collection Samples, Stability Variance, Plasticity, Yield, Grain Weight per Spike

References

[1]	Padalka, O. I., Muzafarova, V. A., Riabchun, V. K., Petukhova, I. A., & Bohuslavskyi, R. L. (2016) Spring durum wheat trait collection by a set of valuable economic features – a source of starting material for breeding. Plant Genetic Resources 19: 48–57.
[2]	Studnicki M., Wijata M., Sobczyński G., Samborski S., & Rozbicki J. (2018) Assessing grain yield and quality traits stability of spring wheat cultivars at different crop management levels. Cereal Res Commun 46 (1): 180–190. doi: 10.1556/0806.45.2017.066.
[3]	Postovalov, A., Sukhanova, S., Plotnikov A., Sazhina, S., & Sozinov, A. (2020) Formation of highly productive agrophytocenoses of peas and spring rapeseed in Trans-Urals. KnE Life Sci 5 (1): 475–481. doi: 10.18502/kls.v5i1.6109.
[4]	Suneja, Y., Gupta, A. K., & Bains, N. S. (2019) Stress adaptive plasticity: Aegilops tauschii and Triticum dicoccoides as potential donors of drought associated morpho-physiological traits in wheat. Front Plant Sci 10: 211. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00211.
[5]	Anuarbek, S., Abugalieva, S., Pecchioni, N, Laidò, G., Maccaferri, M., Tuberosa, R., & Turuspekov, Y. (2020) Quantitative trait loci for agronomic traits in tetraploid wheat for enhancing grain yield in Kazakhstan environments. PLoS ONE 15 (6): e0234863. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234863.
[6]	Bleidere, M., Grunte, I., & Legzdina, L. (2020) Performance and stability of agronomic and grain quality traits of Latvian spring barley varieties. Proc Latvian Acad Sci. Section B 74 (4): 270–279. doi: 10.2478/prolas-2020-0042.
[7]	Ghaedrahmati, M., Hossein Pour, T., & Ahmadi, A. (2017) Study of grain yield stability of durum wheat genotypes using AMMI. J Crop Breed 9 (23): 67–75.
[8]	Mareniuk, A. B. (2014) Plasticity and stability of quantitative traits of collection spring barley variety samples under the conditions of increased soil acidity. Plant Breeding and Seed Production 106: 77–82 (UA).
[9]	Arjona, J. M., Villegas, D., Ammar, K., Dreisigacker, S., Alfaro, C., & Royo, C. (2020) The effect of photoperiod genes and flowering time on yield and yield stability in durum wheat. Plants 9 (12): 1723. doi: 10.3390/plants9121723.
[10]	Hafsi, M., Hadji, A., Semcheddine, N., Rouabhi, A., & Maamri, K. (2018) Stability value of carbon isotope discrimination tool for durum wheat selection in semi-arid condition. Agri Res & Tech: Open Access J 18 (2): 556051. doi: 10.19080/ARTOAJ.2018.18.556051.
[11]	Mohammadi R. (2014) Phenotypic plasticity of yield and related traits in rainfed durum wheat The Journal of Agricultural Science, Volume 152, Issue 6, December, pp. 873 – 884 doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859613000580.
[12]	Bányai, J., Kiss, T., Gizaw, S. A., Mayer, M., Spitkó, T., Tóth, V., Kuti, C., Mészáros, K., Láng, L., Karsai, I., & Vida, G. (2020) Identification of superior spring durum wheat genotypes under irrigated and rain-fed conditions. Cereal Res Commun 48: 355–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42976-020-00034-z.
[13]	Hassan, M. S., Mohamed, G. I. A., & El-Said, R. A. R. (2013) Stability Analysis for Grain Yield and its Components of Some Durum Wheat Genotypes (Triticum durum L.) Under Different Environments. Asian Journal of Crop Science 5: 179-189. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2013.179.189.
[14]	Mazzucotelli, E., Sciara, G., Mastrangelo, A., Desiderio, F., Xu, SS., Faris, J., Hayden, M. J., Tricker, P. J., Ozkan, H., Echenique, V., Steffenson, B. J., Knox, R., Niane, A. A., Udupa, S. M., Longin, F. C. H., Marone, D., Petruzzino, G., Corneti, S., Ormanbekova, D., Pozniak, C., Roncallo, P. F., Mather, D., Able, J. A., Amri, A., Braun, H., Ammar, K., Baum, M., Cattivelli, L., Maccaferri, M., Tuberosa, R., & Bassi, F. M. (2020) The Global Durum Wheat Panel (GDP): An International Platform to Identify and Exchange Beneficial Alleles. Front Plant Sci 11: 569905. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.569905.
[15]	Adjabi, A., Bouzerzour, H., & Benmahammed, A. (2014) Stability Analysis of Durum Wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) Grain Yield. Journal of Agronomy 13: 131–139. https://doi.org/10.3923/ja.2014.131.139.
[16]	Schauberger, B., Ben-Ari, T., Makowski, D. Kato, T., Kato, H., & Ciais, Ph. (2018) Yield trends, variability and stagnation analysis of major crops in France over more than a century. Sci Rep 8, 16865. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35351-1.
[17]	Mekonnen, M., Sharie, G., Bayable, M., Teshager, A., Abebe, E., Ferede, M., Fentie, D., Wale, S., Tay, Y., Getaneh, D., Ayaleneh, Z., & Malefia, A. (2020) Participatory variety selection and stability analysis of Durum wheat varieties (Triticum durum Desf.) in northwest Amhara. Cogent Food & Agriculture 6 (1): 1746229. doi: 10.1080/23311932.2020.1746229.
[18]	Beral, A., Rincent, R., Le Gouis, J., Girousse, C., & Allard, V. (2020) Wheat individual grain-size variance originates from crop development and from specific genetic determinism. PLoS ONE 15 (3): e0230689. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230689.
[19]	Oostra, V., Saastamoinen, M., Zwaan, B. J. & Wheat, C. W. (2018) Strong phenotypic plasticity limits potential for evolutionary responses to climate change. Nat Commun 9: 1005. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03384-9.
[20]	Chevin, L. M, Hoffmann, A. A. (2017) Evolution of phenotypic plasticity in extreme environments. Phil Trans R Soc B 372: 20160138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0138.
[21]	Sanad, M. N. M. E., Campbell, K. G., & Gill, K. S. (2016) Developmental program impacts phenological plasticity of spring wheat under drought. Bot Stud 57: 35. doi: 10.1186/s40529-016-0149-3.
[22]	Kochmarskyi, V. S., Zamlila, N. P., Vologdina, G. B., Gumeniuk, O. V., & Voloshchuk, S. I. (2016) Adaptability level of perspective lines of bread winter wheat in the conditions of Forest-steppe of Ukraine. Myronika Bulletin 2: 98–116 (UA). doi: 10.21498/2518-7910.0.2016.119549.
[23]	Khomenko, S. O., Kochmarskyi, V. S., Fedorenko, I. V., & Fedorenko, M. V. (2018) Stability and plasticity of collection samples of soft spring wheat in terms of productivity. Bulletin of Uman National University of Horticulture 1: 43–47 (UA). doi: 10.31395/2310-0478-2018-1-43-47.
[24]	Khomenko, S. O., Kochmarskyi, V. S., Fedorenko, I. V., & Fedorenko, M. V. (2020) Breeding value of spring durum wheat accessions for performance traits under environment of Ukrainian Forest-Steppe. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection 16 (3): 303–309 (UA). doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.16.3.2020.214924.
[25]	Hudzenko, V. M., Vasylkivskyi, S. P., & Polishchuk, T. P. (2017) Performance and adaptability of spring barley accessions multi-years trials in the Central Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Plant Genetic Resources 20: 31–43 (UA).
[26]	Hudzenko, V. M., Polishchuk, T. P., Babii, O. O., & Khudolii, L. V. (2018) Productivity and adaptability of Myronivka spring barley varieties of different breeding periods. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection 14 (2): 190–202 (UA). doi: 10.21498/2518-1017.14.2.2018.134766.
[27]	Gudzenko, V. N. (2019) Statistical and graphical (GGE biplot) evaluation of the adaptive ability and stability of winter barley breeding lines. Vavilov Journal of Genetics and Breeding 23 (1): 110–118 (RU). doi: 10.18699/VJ19.469.
[28]	Nikolaev, P. N., Popolzukhin, P. V., Aniskov, N. I., Yusova, O. A., & Safonova, I. V. (2018) Evaluation of the adaptive properties of spring barley varieties according to their yield capacity in the environments of the Near-Irtysh area in Omsk province. Proc Appl Bot Genet Plant Breed 179 (2): 96–105 (RU). doi: 10.30901/2227-8834-2018-2-96-105.
[29]	Bilyavska, L. G.., Belyavskiy, Y. V., & Diyanova, A. A. (2018) Estimation of environmental stability and plasticity of soybean varieties. Legumes and Groat Crops 4: 42–48 (RU). doi: 10.24411/2309-348X-2018-11048.
[30]	Shchypak, H. V., Sviatchenko, S. I., & Nepochatov, M. I. (2014) Evaluation of winter triticale variety samples by ecological plasticity and stability of basic productivity traits Bulletin of the Center for Science Provision of Agribusiness in the Kharkiv region 16: 247–256 (UA).
[31]	Marukhnyak A. Ya., Dats’ko A. O., Lisova Yu. A., & Marukhnyak, H. I. (2017) Plasticity and stability of quantitative signs of productivity of oat samples. Foothill and Mountain Agriculture and Stockbreeding. 61: 80–90 (UA).
[32]	Buniak, O. I. (2016) Ecological stability and plasticity of naked oat varieties in the Northern Forest-Steppe of Ukraine. Myronivka Bulletin 2: 25–39 (UA).
[33]	Taran, V. G., Kalenska, S. M., Novytska, N. V., & Daniliv, P. O. (2018) Stability and plasticity of corn hybrids in depending on fertilizing system and density of plant stand in the right-bank forest-steppe of Ukraine. Bioresources and Nature Management. Agronomy 10 (3–4): 147–156 (UA). https://doi.org/10.31548/bio2018.03.019.
[34]	Mazur, V. A., Branitsky, Y. Y., & Mazur, O. V. (2020) Selection value and adaptability of common bean varieties in the conditions of Uladovo-Lyulinetska research and selection station of Institute of Bioenergy Crops and Sugar Beets NAASU. Agriculture and Forestry 19: 5–14 (UA). doi: 10.37128 / 2707-5826-2020-4-1.
[35]	Eberhart, S. A., & Russell, W. A. (1966) Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci 6 (1): 36–40.
[36]	Dospekhov, B. A. (1985) Methods of field experiment (with the basics of statistical processing of research results). Moscow: Agropromizdat (RU).
[37]	Selyaninov, G. T. (1937). Methods of agricultural characteristics of climate. In World Agroclimatic Reference Book (pp. 5–29). Moscow: Gidrometeoizdat (RU).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Oleksandr Demydov, Svitlana Khomenko, Maryna Fedorenko, Yevhenii Kuzmenko, Serhii Pykalo. (2021). Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Oleksandr Demydov; Svitlana Khomenko; Maryna Fedorenko; Yevhenii Kuzmenko; Serhii Pykalo. Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(2), 83-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Oleksandr Demydov, Svitlana Khomenko, Maryna Fedorenko, Yevhenii Kuzmenko, Serhii Pykalo. Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(2):83-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16,
  author = {Oleksandr Demydov and Svitlana Khomenko and Maryna Fedorenko and Yevhenii Kuzmenko and Serhii Pykalo},
  title = {Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {83-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  abstract = {When working with collection material, one of the main problems is the study of most of the samples in a cycle of three years and the annual partial renewal of the set under study. Therefore, only a part of the varieties can be directly compared with each other in terms of ecological stability, and the main grouping has to be carried out by comparing the behavior of samples with standard varieties under conditions of different years. Even well-studied varieties are not always suitable for such comparisons. When selecting the starting material for breeding, it is important not only to find forms with a high level of manifestation of quantitative traits, but also to minimize this level under unfavorable conditions for plant growth and development. The purpose of our research was to determine the stability and plasticity of collection samples of spring durum wheat of various ecological and geographical origins. Over the years of the research, the yield averaged 330.3 g/m2 and varied from 434.3 g/m2 (max) in 2015 to 188.5 g/m2 (min) in 2018. This indicates that the genotype and contrast weather conditions of the years significantly affect the yield of collection samples of spring durum wheat. Stable and plastic collection samples of spring durum wheat were identified for yield: 193 THKNEE 8 (Mexico) (bi = 1.02, S2di = 0.11), ARN AAZ-1.040 YRC-4M (Mexico) (bi = 1.35, S2di = 0.12), SHAG 21 / CASCA (Mexico) (bi = 1.07, S2di = 0.23), Hordeiforme 13-07 (Ukraine) (bi = 2.11, S2di = 0.31). According to the results of our research, it was found that the highest grain weight per spike (1.90 g) was in the sample Voronezhskaya 11 (Russia), and the lowest value was in the sample Damsinskaya yantarnaya (Kazakhstan) (1.57 g). Among the plastic and stable collection samples by the grain weight per spike, the following samples were distinguished: DUN / MUSK 1 (bi = 3.45; S2di = 0.07), SHAG 9 / BBUTO / 7 (bi = 1.61; S2di = 0, 05), CASM 3 // SRN 3 ASAIH 15 (bi = 1.47; S2di = 0.00), GREEN / SOMO (bi = 1.35; S2di = 0.01) (Mexico), Lilek (Russia) (bi = 0.92, S2di = 0.03), MAGH 72 FUTO ALG 86 (Mexico) (bi = 0.75, S2di = 0.01), YAZI 13 (Mexico) (bi = 0.12, S2di = 0.07).},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine
AU  - Oleksandr Demydov
AU  - Svitlana Khomenko
AU  - Maryna Fedorenko
AU  - Yevhenii Kuzmenko
AU  - Serhii Pykalo
Y1  - 2021/03/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 83
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
AB  - When working with collection material, one of the main problems is the study of most of the samples in a cycle of three years and the annual partial renewal of the set under study. Therefore, only a part of the varieties can be directly compared with each other in terms of ecological stability, and the main grouping has to be carried out by comparing the behavior of samples with standard varieties under conditions of different years. Even well-studied varieties are not always suitable for such comparisons. When selecting the starting material for breeding, it is important not only to find forms with a high level of manifestation of quantitative traits, but also to minimize this level under unfavorable conditions for plant growth and development. The purpose of our research was to determine the stability and plasticity of collection samples of spring durum wheat of various ecological and geographical origins. Over the years of the research, the yield averaged 330.3 g/m2 and varied from 434.3 g/m2 (max) in 2015 to 188.5 g/m2 (min) in 2018. This indicates that the genotype and contrast weather conditions of the years significantly affect the yield of collection samples of spring durum wheat. Stable and plastic collection samples of spring durum wheat were identified for yield: 193 THKNEE 8 (Mexico) (bi = 1.02, S2di = 0.11), ARN AAZ-1.040 YRC-4M (Mexico) (bi = 1.35, S2di = 0.12), SHAG 21 / CASCA (Mexico) (bi = 1.07, S2di = 0.23), Hordeiforme 13-07 (Ukraine) (bi = 2.11, S2di = 0.31). According to the results of our research, it was found that the highest grain weight per spike (1.90 g) was in the sample Voronezhskaya 11 (Russia), and the lowest value was in the sample Damsinskaya yantarnaya (Kazakhstan) (1.57 g). Among the plastic and stable collection samples by the grain weight per spike, the following samples were distinguished: DUN / MUSK 1 (bi = 3.45; S2di = 0.07), SHAG 9 / BBUTO / 7 (bi = 1.61; S2di = 0, 05), CASM 3 // SRN 3 ASAIH 15 (bi = 1.47; S2di = 0.00), GREEN / SOMO (bi = 1.35; S2di = 0.01) (Mexico), Lilek (Russia) (bi = 0.92, S2di = 0.03), MAGH 72 FUTO ALG 86 (Mexico) (bi = 0.75, S2di = 0.01), YAZI 13 (Mexico) (bi = 0.12, S2di = 0.07).
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Oleksandr Demydov

Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne, Ukraine
Svitlana Khomenko

Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne, Ukraine
Maryna Fedorenko

Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne, Ukraine
Yevhenii Kuzmenko

Department of Cereal Crops Breeding, the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne, Ukraine
Serhii Pykalo

Department of Biotechnology, Genetics and Physiology, the V. M. Remeslo Myronivka Institute of Wheat of National Academy of Agrarian Sciences of Ukraine, Tsentralne, Ukraine

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Oleksandr Demydov, Svitlana Khomenko, Maryna Fedorenko, Yevhenii Kuzmenko, Serhii Pykalo. (2021). Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, 9(2), 83-88. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Oleksandr Demydov; Svitlana Khomenko; Maryna Fedorenko; Yevhenii Kuzmenko; Serhii Pykalo. Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. Am. J. Agric. For. 2021, 9(2), 83-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Oleksandr Demydov, Svitlana Khomenko, Maryna Fedorenko, Yevhenii Kuzmenko, Serhii Pykalo. Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine. Am J Agric For. 2021;9(2):83-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16,
  author = {Oleksandr Demydov and Svitlana Khomenko and Maryna Fedorenko and Yevhenii Kuzmenko and Serhii Pykalo},
  title = {Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine},
  journal = {American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry},
  volume = {9},
  number = {2},
  pages = {83-88},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajaf.20210902.16},
  abstract = {When working with collection material, one of the main problems is the study of most of the samples in a cycle of three years and the annual partial renewal of the set under study. Therefore, only a part of the varieties can be directly compared with each other in terms of ecological stability, and the main grouping has to be carried out by comparing the behavior of samples with standard varieties under conditions of different years. Even well-studied varieties are not always suitable for such comparisons. When selecting the starting material for breeding, it is important not only to find forms with a high level of manifestation of quantitative traits, but also to minimize this level under unfavorable conditions for plant growth and development. The purpose of our research was to determine the stability and plasticity of collection samples of spring durum wheat of various ecological and geographical origins. Over the years of the research, the yield averaged 330.3 g/m2 and varied from 434.3 g/m2 (max) in 2015 to 188.5 g/m2 (min) in 2018. This indicates that the genotype and contrast weather conditions of the years significantly affect the yield of collection samples of spring durum wheat. Stable and plastic collection samples of spring durum wheat were identified for yield: 193 THKNEE 8 (Mexico) (bi = 1.02, S2di = 0.11), ARN AAZ-1.040 YRC-4M (Mexico) (bi = 1.35, S2di = 0.12), SHAG 21 / CASCA (Mexico) (bi = 1.07, S2di = 0.23), Hordeiforme 13-07 (Ukraine) (bi = 2.11, S2di = 0.31). According to the results of our research, it was found that the highest grain weight per spike (1.90 g) was in the sample Voronezhskaya 11 (Russia), and the lowest value was in the sample Damsinskaya yantarnaya (Kazakhstan) (1.57 g). Among the plastic and stable collection samples by the grain weight per spike, the following samples were distinguished: DUN / MUSK 1 (bi = 3.45; S2di = 0.07), SHAG 9 / BBUTO / 7 (bi = 1.61; S2di = 0, 05), CASM 3 // SRN 3 ASAIH 15 (bi = 1.47; S2di = 0.00), GREEN / SOMO (bi = 1.35; S2di = 0.01) (Mexico), Lilek (Russia) (bi = 0.92, S2di = 0.03), MAGH 72 FUTO ALG 86 (Mexico) (bi = 0.75, S2di = 0.01), YAZI 13 (Mexico) (bi = 0.12, S2di = 0.07).},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Stability and Plasticity of Collection Samples of Durum Spring Wheat in the Forest-Steppe Conditions of Ukraine
AU  - Oleksandr Demydov
AU  - Svitlana Khomenko
AU  - Maryna Fedorenko
AU  - Yevhenii Kuzmenko
AU  - Serhii Pykalo
Y1  - 2021/03/22
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
T2  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JF  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
JO  - American Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
SP  - 83
EP  - 88
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2330-8591
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajaf.20210902.16
AB  - When working with collection material, one of the main problems is the study of most of the samples in a cycle of three years and the annual partial renewal of the set under study. Therefore, only a part of the varieties can be directly compared with each other in terms of ecological stability, and the main grouping has to be carried out by comparing the behavior of samples with standard varieties under conditions of different years. Even well-studied varieties are not always suitable for such comparisons. When selecting the starting material for breeding, it is important not only to find forms with a high level of manifestation of quantitative traits, but also to minimize this level under unfavorable conditions for plant growth and development. The purpose of our research was to determine the stability and plasticity of collection samples of spring durum wheat of various ecological and geographical origins. Over the years of the research, the yield averaged 330.3 g/m2 and varied from 434.3 g/m2 (max) in 2015 to 188.5 g/m2 (min) in 2018. This indicates that the genotype and contrast weather conditions of the years significantly affect the yield of collection samples of spring durum wheat. Stable and plastic collection samples of spring durum wheat were identified for yield: 193 THKNEE 8 (Mexico) (bi = 1.02, S2di = 0.11), ARN AAZ-1.040 YRC-4M (Mexico) (bi = 1.35, S2di = 0.12), SHAG 21 / CASCA (Mexico) (bi = 1.07, S2di = 0.23), Hordeiforme 13-07 (Ukraine) (bi = 2.11, S2di = 0.31). According to the results of our research, it was found that the highest grain weight per spike (1.90 g) was in the sample Voronezhskaya 11 (Russia), and the lowest value was in the sample Damsinskaya yantarnaya (Kazakhstan) (1.57 g). Among the plastic and stable collection samples by the grain weight per spike, the following samples were distinguished: DUN / MUSK 1 (bi = 3.45; S2di = 0.07), SHAG 9 / BBUTO / 7 (bi = 1.61; S2di = 0, 05), CASM 3 // SRN 3 ASAIH 15 (bi = 1.47; S2di = 0.00), GREEN / SOMO (bi = 1.35; S2di = 0.01) (Mexico), Lilek (Russia) (bi = 0.92, S2di = 0.03), MAGH 72 FUTO ALG 86 (Mexico) (bi = 0.75, S2di = 0.01), YAZI 13 (Mexico) (bi = 0.12, S2di = 0.07).
VL  - 9
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download