International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Corporate Governance & Rights and Privileges of Minority Shareholders of Family-Owned Firms: Evidence from the Emerging Economy

Corporate Governance has recently become an important issue in Bangladesh. The principal characteristics of effective corporate governance are protection of rights and privileges of minority shareholders and transparency of companies. The Companies Act of 1994, which was passed with the protection of minority shareholders as one of its key objectives, has fallen short of providing minorities with the security and remedy they were expecting against oppression. The main objective of the study is to evaluate the rights and privileges of minority shareholders in the family-owned firms on the perception of three major stakeholders of the sample companies. For this purpose, the study has developed a questionnaire based on recent literature survey and gathered the opinions of the executive/non-executive directors, Independent directors and shareholders of sample companies under the framework of 5 point likert scale. The gathered primary data have been analyzed by appropriate number of descriptive and inferential statistics. In examining the state of minority shareholders’ rights and privileges in the sample listed firms, the study takes the perception of the executive/non-executive directors, the independent directors, and the shareholders and finds that they have shown different views from each other, indicating that there are likely irregular/unmethodical practices of the board directors in this respect in the sample firms. In measuring the level of importance on different issues of corporate governance on listed family-owned firms of Bangladesh given by the respondents, the study observed that the groups have a significant difference on minority shareholders’ rights and privileges and an insignificant difference on cumulative voting rights. Finally, the study gives some recommendations for the remedies of minority shareholders.

Minority Shareholders’ Rights and Privileges, Cumulative Voting, Annual General Meeting (AGM), Voting Rights

APA Style

Suman Dey. (2023). Corporate Governance & Rights and Privileges of Minority Shareholders of Family-Owned Firms: Evidence from the Emerging Economy. International Journal of Economics, Finance and Management Sciences, 11(5), 273-284.

ACS Style

Suman Dey. Corporate Governance & Rights and Privileges of Minority Shareholders of Family-Owned Firms: Evidence from the Emerging Economy. Int. J. Econ. Finance Manag. Sci. 2023, 11(5), 273-284. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20231105.17

AMA Style

Suman Dey. Corporate Governance & Rights and Privileges of Minority Shareholders of Family-Owned Firms: Evidence from the Emerging Economy. Int J Econ Finance Manag Sci. 2023;11(5):273-284. doi: 10.11648/j.ijefm.20231105.17

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Adams, M. (1994). Agency theory and the internal audit. Managerial Auditing Journal, 9(8), 8–12.
2. Andrade, G., Mitchell, M., & Stafford, E. (2001). New evidence and perspectives on mergers. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 103-120.
3. Bangladesh Enterprise Institute (BEI, 2004). The code of corporate governance for Bangladesh. Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, pp. 1-85, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
4. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The Modern Corporation and Private Property. Macmillan. New York, 2(3), 45-53.
5. Chittagong Stock Exchange Workshop (2004). Corporate Governance in Bangladesh: Capacity Building of Securities and Exchange Commission and Selected capital market Institutions (Paper Presented in CSE, by Aries Group Ltd. of United States). ADB, Bangladesh.
6. Estamanco (Kilner House) Ltd v Greater London Council (1982)1 All ER 437,1 WLR 2, 8
7. Foss v Harbottle (1843) 67 ER 189.
8. Franks, J., & Mayer, C. (1997). Corporate ownership and control in the UK, Germany, and France. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 9(4), 30-45.
9. Khan, N. I. (2019). Statutory provisions of AGM of companies. Retrieve from https://m.theindependent home/printnews/199649
10. KPPB Law (2018). How to Protect Your Rights as a Minority Shareholder. Retrieve from
11. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. The Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471-516.
12. Lease, R. C., McConnell, J. J., & Mikkelson, W. H. (1983). The market value of control in publicly-traded corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1-4), 439-471.
13. Maher, M., & Andersson, T. (2000). Corporate governance: Effects on firm performance and economic growth. Retrieve from SSRN 218490.
14. Mallin, C. A. (2007). Corporate Governance (2nd Edition). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Menon, K., & Williams, J. D. (1994). The use of audit committees for monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 13(2), 121-139.
16. OECD (2004). Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD Publications, France. ISBN: 92-64-01597-3- No. 53533.
17. OECD (2013). Reform priorities in Asia: Taking corporate governance to a higher level. Corporate Governance, OECD Publishing.
18. Payne, G. T., & Petrenko, O. V. (2019). Agency theory in business and management research. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management, 1–20. Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Re Jermyn Street Turkish Baths Ltd., RE [1970] 1 WLR 1 194; revsd. [1971] 3 A11 ER 184.
20. Re Legal Cost Negotiation Ltd. (1999) 2 BCLC 171.
21. Rusmin. A. (2019, April 23). Five reasons why you should attend annual general meetings if you’re an investor. The Fifth Person. Retrieve from https://
22. Sandberg, J. (2011). Changing the world through shareholder activism? Etikk i praksis-Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 5(1), 51-78.
23. Sarbah, A., Quaye, I., & Affum-Osei, E. (2016). Corporate governance in family businesses: The role of the non-executive and independent directors. Open Journal of Business and Management, 4(1), 14.
24. Sattar, S. (2018). Company meetings and impracticability. The Daily Star, March 13. Retrieve from
25. Shkolnikov, A. (2006). Protecting minority shareholders in emerging markets. A report published by the Center for International Private Enterprise, October 31.
26. Siddiqui, M. S. (2013, November 25). Protecting interest of the minority shareholders. The Financial Express, The Financial Newspaper of Bangladesh. Retrieve from 2013/ 11/25/5614
27. Sobhan, F. and Werner, W. (2003). A Comparative analysis of corporate governance in South Asia: Charting a roadmap for Bangladesh. Bangladesh Enterprise Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
28. The Companies Act (Bangladesh) 1994. Published in Zahir, M. (2005), “Company and Securities Law”. The University Press Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
29. The Companies Act (UK) 2006. Published in French, D. (2007), “Blackstone’s Statutes on Company Law”. Oxford University Press, UK.
30. U. S. Securities & Exchange Commission (2007). Audit Committees and Auditor Independence. Retrieve from 042707.htm
31. Yasser, Q. R. (2011). Challenges in corporate governance- A family controlled business prospective. International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(1), 73.
32. Zahir, M. (2005). Company and securities laws (Revised and Updated Edition). The University Press Limited, Dhaka.